• 特集
  • 番組
  • トピックス
  • 学び
プレミアムを無料で体験

A crucial change is needed to improve corporate governance in Japan

www.ft.com
1
Picks
このまま本文を読む
本文を読む

コメント


のアイコン

選択しているユーザー

  • 公益社団法人会社役員育成機構 (BDTI) 代表理事 (Representative Director)

    My FT article about Japan's schizophrenic approach to stewardship, which is the reason why there is almost zero "collective engagement" like Engine No. 1 here. "Institutional investor, thou shalt engage with companies "! BUT, "If you intend to make any important suggestions to the firm, thou shalt publicly paste "probable activist" on your forehead if you buy more than 5%." "Oh, and you must cope with 'large holder' reporting rules that are more burdensome than those applying large holders who promise to shut up and make no important suggestions." Unlike the UK (which Japan is emulating in general) holders of more than 5% have to publicly state their purpose in investing in that company, as being either "pure investment" or "may suggest important actions" to the company.


アプリをダウンロード

NewsPicks について

SNSアカウント


関連サービス


法人・団体向けサービス


その他


© Uzabase, Inc

マイニュースに代わり
フォローを今後利用しますか